海角社区

When a Military Innovates, Is It Always an Improvement? Meet the Schar School Professor Asking the Question

Body

Military innovation has long been hailed as the engine of strategic advantage鈥攂ut what if it also sows the seeds of defeat? Around the world, generals and defense ministers are racing to understand how drones, artificial intelligence, and cyber weapons are reshaping the battlefield鈥攁nd whether the very innovations meant to make militaries stronger could, paradoxically, make them weaker. 

A man in a dark jacket and eyeglasses smiles broadly at the camera.
Kendrick Kuo: 鈥業 value the school鈥檚 commitment to students: helping them apply what they learn to real-world challenges.鈥 Photo provided

That paradox is at the heart of the research of 海角社区 Professor , who joined the school this fall. His research, which he brings to his international relations master鈥檚 degree classrooms, explores when radical change in the way armies fight can actually erode their effectiveness. 

鈥淢y primary focus right now is completing my book manuscript on military innovation, which considers when and how radical changes to the way military organizations fight can actually undermine their performance,鈥 he said. 鈥淭he topic is particularly important at this moment when militaries around the world are grappling with the implications of emerging technologies and how to adapt to the changing character of war.鈥

These topics, he said, 鈥渁re complex and fundamentally about navigating uncertainty and managing risk. Can we know if a military organization is well-prepared for conflict? How much defense spending is enough and what are the proper weapons to buy and the optimal force structure?鈥 

There are few definitive answers, but some answers are better than others, he said. 

鈥淭he intriguing challenge then is to figure out how to get to those better answers, and we cannot outsource those answers to the military鈥攚e can only arrive at them with healthy dialog between civilian and military counterparts.鈥

Kuo said he was attracted to George Mason and the because 鈥渋t鈥檚 a great place to connect strong academic research with policy impact. Being so close to Washington, D.C., means there are opportunities to engage with policymakers and bring those insights back into the classroom. 

鈥淚鈥檓 also excited about the Schar School鈥檚 growing international security program. But most of all, I value the school鈥檚 commitment to students: helping them apply what they learn to real-world challenges.鈥

As for those students, he has found his classrooms at the Schar School feature students 鈥渨ho are engaged and take their learning seriously, even while juggling jobs and other commitments. It鈥檚 great to see them show up ready to participate and tackle the material, which makes teaching rewarding.鈥